
|
NEWSLETTER No.14 |
Message from Adridharana Dasa,
Temple President ISKCON Calcutta:In this newsletter we highlight the grave
situation that ISKCON is currently in due to the bogus Guru system that it
operates under. Having openly practised every deviation possible, as well as
having entered into the 'higher' gopi-bhava teachings of the Gaudiya Matha, it
seems the Gurus are not satisfied. They continue to delve into teachings that
are outside of, and different to, Srila Prabhupada's teachings. We also
highlight the naked theft of funds by the Mayapur Temple from Srila Prabhupada's
samadhi.
Please read on:
| CONTENTS: |
1. Sahajiyism Makes A Comeback In
ISKCON
2. Srila Prabhupada's Samadhi Funds Raided
|
1. Sahajiyism Makes A Comeback In ISKCON |
Recently Sivarama Swami offered his resignation from the GBC under the guise of claiming that he was offended by how Srila Prabhupada was being minimised on an internet com forum by other ISKCON devotees:
| "My
objection is to the lack of response by the GBC in supporting an
inviolable principle, 'Srila Prabhupada cannot be minimized in ISKCON' and
taking some interim steps until the entire issue is finally
resolved." (Sivarama Swami's resignation letter) |
[The above relates to an instance where a BBT
translator openly expressed doubts about Srila Prabhupada's teachings]
This in itself was strange coming from a man who has spent his whole career
in ISKCON doing nothing BUT minimising Srila Prabhupada:
However maybe he was now turning over a new leaf
and learning to appreciate Srila Prabhupada?
Unfortunately no - for as we will see, this expression of sudden 'concern' at
Srila Prabhupada's 'minimisation' was nothing but 'crocodile tears'. For
recently he sent this message of support for Tripurari Maharaja's newsletter,
'Sanga':
| "Just
a short note of appreciation for the Sanga excerpts. Thank you." - Sivarama Swami |
Tripurari Swami, through his 'Sanga' newsletter,
systematically promotes teachings outside of, and different to, Srila
Prabhupada's teachings. He gives Gaudiya Matha figures like Sridhar Maharaja (whom
Srila Prabhupada labelled a 'serious offender' for breaking up the entire
Gaudiya Matha) equal status with Srila Prabhupada. Even the GBC preach
against going to the Gaudiya Matha, and here Sivarama praises one of their
biggest promoters.
However the most horrifying thing is that he is not alone in relishing such
minimisation of Srila Prabhupada, for some of the most senior leaders in ISKCON
all seem to love this bogus newsletter, including this year's retiring GBC
chairman, and current GBC Executive Committee 'ex-officio' member, Bir Krishna
Goswami:
| "I
really appreciated this last epistle. Please keep them coming." - B i r K r i s h n a G o s w a m i |
| "I
just wanted to thank you for sending me 'Sanga'. H.H. Sivaram Swami
was hopeful that you could send him 'Sanga' as well. I pray that all your
endeavours will meet with success." - B.B. G o v i n d a S w a m i |
Tripurari Swami is so off he thinks he was ordered by Srila Prabhupada to write another commentary on the Bhagavad Gita according to the present time, place and circumstance:
| "Looking
back at that spring morning in Los Angeles's Cheviot Hills, I felt that my
life would be incomplete if I did not author an edition of Bhagavad-gita
in contemporary language." (S a n g a, Wednesday, February 16, 2000) |
Even the GBC have not gone that far - YET! He is very proud of his own writing too:
| "I do
highly recommend my own books." (Sanga, Sunday, August 22, 1999) |
Apart from his own books, he prefers other previous acarya's writings to Srila Prabhupada's, as this question and answer session reveals:
| "My
question is, why did you overlook the entire written work of our Spiritual
Master Srila Prabhupada and only mention the works of Srila Rupa Gosvami,
Srila Jiva Gosvami and your own book? ANSWER : Jiva Goswami is my favorite writer at this time." (Sanga, Sunday, August 22, 1999) |
Nor does he teach the same as Srila Prabhupada. Here are just a few excerpts from his 'question and answer' sessions in 'Sanga'. Please judge for yourselves:
| "Q.
Recently I had an online discussion with a follower of Radha Rama Caran
Das Babaji. He argued that 'bhaja nitai gaura radhe shyam, japa hare
krishna hare rama' is a bona fide bhajana and he rejected the criticism of
the followers of Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura. He said this is not a
mantra but a bhajana meant for kirtana and that there is no law against
making new bhajans. He also argued that the Hare Krsna mantra is meant
only for japa citing that there is not a single instance in any Caitanya
biography where the Hare Krsna maha-mantra is sung with khol and kartals. A. You must realize that great persons sometimes differ. Both Bhaktisiddhanta and Caran dasa Babaji are great persons, certainly in the sense that they each had a powerful influence on a great number of people, and inspired them to chant Krsna's holy name. So both should be shown some respect, at least from a distance, relevant to which group one is affiliated with. This is common courtesy, and more it is mandated by Rupa Goswami himself." (Sanga, 12th January, 2000) |
Even though Srila Prabhupada condemned the chanters of 'nitai gaura Radhe Syama' as sahajiyas who chant 'chara kirtan', concocted kirtan, 'Sanga' glorifies one of their main proponents Caran das Babaji and Srila Bhaktisidhanta as practically on an equal footing. Why are our GBC men sympathetic rather than outraged at such an accommodating comparison between Srila Bhaktisiddhanta and a sahajiya? Tripurari carries on with his minimisation of Srila Prabhupada's instructions:
| "Q. Once
you said that you didn't consider Harinama to be an effective preaching
tool at present in the West. Why is that? A. This was in reference to chanting on the streets." ( S a n g a, Wednesday, January 12, 2000) |
So according to Triparari we should stop all
Harinam. When did Srila Prabhupada ever teach that Harinama was not an
'effective preaching tool' - or that it should be stopped if ever we thought
that it ceased to be 'effective'?
Someone, who is obviously having difficulty chanting sixteen rounds a day, asks
'Sanga' a question about counting rounds:
| "Q. I
find it a huge burden to count rounds yet I readily chant either aloud or
in my mind throughout the day. Why is it so important to chant a
prescribed number of rounds daily? A. Counting is maya. Maya means to measure. Under the influence of maya we try to measure everything and bring it within our grasp. The finite tries in this way to capture the infinite. This is futile. So we are not to count, but to chant, and chant always, 'kirtaniyah sada harih." ('Sanga', 11th February, 2000) |
Where did Srila Prabhupada ever teach that counting was Maya? Tripurari also thinks that the stories of the Bhagavatam could be imaginative poetry, rather than as historic fact:
| "Q. You
once said that sometimes poetic descriptions are used in the Bhagavatam.
For example, a man with a thousand arms may be a poetic way of describing
a big person. How should we approach the sacred literatures: literally or
symbolically? A. How can a book of poetry be without this? We should try to find the philosophical message in each episode of the Bhagavata first. Later we may live in the poetic Bhagavata world. For preaching it is important to focus on the tattva of the treatise. [...] At the same time one has to think that the poet sees that which he describes, for he lives in that conceptual world. " (Sanga, Sunday, December 19, 1999) |
So Srila Vyasadeva was actually a poet given to
fanciful descriptions of his own 'conceptual world'?
And in this vein the 'Sanga' newsletters carry on and on, discussing for
instance, Sridhara Maharaja's explanations of how Radharani may ask Krishna to
have devotees change their rasa's etc. etc. Clearly the 'Gopi Bhava' days
of Tamal Krishna and his crew are not behind us. It seems that the desire to go 'beyond'
and outside of Srila Prabhupada's teachings is deeply rooted in ISKCON's
leaders as long as their desire to remain as bogus gurus remains deeply rooted.
What is interesting is that Sivarama Swami and Bir Krishna Goswami were on the
OPPOSITE sides of the debate over the 'minimisation' of Srila Prabhupada
that was going on via the internet recently. Yet as we see above, as long as one
supports the usurping of Srila Prabhupada's position as ISKCON's only Diksa
guru, one will always actually be on the side of MINIMISING Srila Prabhupada,
for to have removed Srila Prabhupada as ISKCON's Diksa Guru, is ultimately the
greatest minimisation of Srila Prabhupada that one can perform.
Srila Prabhupada's puspa samadhi in Mayapur has
just suffered the resignation of its long-serving and very able manager, Uttama
Sloka Das. Under his stewardship, the samadhi was well managed, attracted many
visitors, and built up a healthy cash surplus to keep the samadhi maintained,
and carry out much needed repairs. This cash amounted to almost $100,000, and
was needed urgently for repairs to the samadhi. Indeed this money came from
well-wishers who go to Mayapur and donate the money specifically for the upkeep
of the samadhi. However due to constant mismangement by the Mayapur authorities
under the direction of the HH Jayapataka Swami, the Mayapur temple was facing
financial difficulties.
Thus the Mayapur authorities have decided to mis-appropriate the money that was
kept specifically in a separate account for the samadhi. This act of daylight
robbery is what has led to the resignation of Uttama Sloka. Please note that the
samadhi attracts many visitors of all different political persuasions, attracted
simply by Srila Prabhupada. They naturally thought that their donations would go
directly to the upkeep of Srila Prabhupada's samadhi, and gave it for that
purpose. They did not expect that Jayapataka and his men would take the money as
soon as they needed it. This mis-appropriation of funds and the attached
negative publicity, comes at the worst possible time for Mayapur, just as they
are trying to revive the Mayapur project and embark on a major fund-raising
campaign specifically for the Mayapur 'Temple of Understanding' and Planetarium.
It is clear that contrary to whatever may appear to be the case, whenever
Jayapataka and his men deem it necessary, any funds given to another project can
be taken by them simply to pay for the general upkeep of the Mayapur temple,
with its many associated salaries for householders like Hari Sauri etc etc. It
also raises the question as to how widespread such activity is throughout the
rest of ISKCON. Devotees therefore will now be on their guard about giving money
to ANY ISKCON project, since if money can be taken from Srila Prabhupada's
samadhi - it can be taken from anywhere.
YOU
HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!!!!!
We will keep you updated with the ramifications of this
scandal, whose implications stretch far beyond Mayapur. The IRM will also make
sure that the exact details of this scandal will be made available to every
ISKCON congregation that donates funds to any ISKCON project. This should make
Jayapataka and his men think twice before they try and take money not intended
for them.
Thank you for taking the time to read this newsletter, and please keep your
letters, and e-mail addresses of other devotees who should be added to our list,
flowing in. A hard copy of our main position paper 'The Final Order' is
available on request. All other IRM papers can be accessed through the EDITORIAL
SECTION of the IRM website at http://www.come.to/irm
If you would like to receive any of the back issues of the Newsletter please let me know.
No 1. Invitation to Srila Prabhupada's Vyasa PujaYour comments, questions and feedback are appreciated. Please write to me at adri@cwcom.net
Your Servant, Adridharan das