CREATION - ANOTHER VIEW

One aspect of the Genesis story is that God needed to rest after his six days of creative labour. It is a Scriptural Mystery why a God who can, on the sayso of all Beleivers, do anything, should not be able to work without fatigue. After all He, it is implied, does not eat, does not get ill, does not grow old and die. If He is exempt from all these essenetially physiological torments .... it seems odd that fatigue, and the need to rest, should be His Lot. Did He get tired as that Creative Week wore on? It seems reasonable to suppose that He did. The need for rest, on our part (and we are "in His image") comes upon us gradually unless we are neurotic enough to repress it and 'live on our nerves'. God is not neurotic.

Certainly, in our own work, efficiency falls off as the week passes its mid point and many studies show that the five day week is actually more productive than the six day week in most jobs. Many sermons (on the seventh day) are quite awful. It is odd that He Who Knows All Things did not seem to know about fatigue and created us on the very dodgy sixth day. Would it not have been better for Him to have put His Feet up after five days and to have made us on the Second Monday. Perhaps He might have built in a bit less Human Fallibility that way.

We have all experienced the 'Friday Afternoon Car' - its doors don't shut properly, it never starts smartly and the gears crash without being asked to. Perhaps Sin and Fall - which we Christians see in us all - are simply that we are 'Friday Afternnon Cars'. There is no Scriptural reference to Fall or Sin among plants, birds, fishes and the other non-human life forms; this fact is surely significant. They were made before God's fatigue began to tell. It is true that God was well pleased with His Work but if He was tired then perhaps He was pleased to get shot of it rather than pleased with it.

But, wait a moment, one is not at one's best on Monday mornings. God knows that too. Carry on Believing.


Return to Home Page