FreeX Mission Review
By Greg Hamerton
Greg Hamerton is a Paragliding
Instructor from Cape Town and has flown over 1000 hours in the thermic
conditions of South Africa. He is the author of the Fresh Air Site
Guide, a regular writer for Cross Country Magazine, and hosts a
free-flying Website at http://www.paragliding.co.za/hammer . He
has flown over 60 wings and prefers XC flying to competitions.
On a MISSION to reach cloud base?
FreeX wowed the market in '96 with the Spark (DHV2/3), a fast, active
glider with light, quick handling. The DHV2 relative of the Spark
was the Spear, released in '97. Pilots were divided - some loved
the wings with passion, but many found the FreeX handling too direct,
and the energy retention of the wings too wild. FreeX responded
by producing two new wings with a more mellow aerofoil - the Flair
(DHV1/2), and the Oxygen (DHV2/3). And now we have the Mission,
the DHV2 replacement for the Spear. What is the essence of this
wing - does it retain the wild side of FreeX, or the soft, smooth
and light handling of the new generation?
CONSTRUCTION :
At last, a backpack that is made for a human being! The new FreeX
backpack has the best geometry, volume, sturdy fabric and padded
straps I have seen on any bag, and it is a pleasure to wear.
FreeX have also got rid
of their notorious 'special speed system', which was inconvenient
when swapping to other gliders, and had sharp, unreliable shackles.
The Mission has a traditional two-pulley system on the risers, which
effects a moderate 16cm shortening of the A's.
Precise manufacture and
elegant curved V-ribs complete the picture of good quality - FreeX
are still just as committed to pleasing their customers as they
were in the early days.
LAUNCH : A quick
pull-up, which accelerates overhead, and has to be held back on
the brakes. The ground-handling requires some getting used to, as
the Mission rolls with the gusts, being fairly active. Without the
brakes applied, the Mission will overfly you. A short takeoff run
lifts you into the air, which is where the wing prefers to be.
HANDLING : A recent
XC course in Bulwer, SA voted the wing as having the best handling
of the DHV2's. I think it depends largely on the kind of pilot you
are. It certainly takes some time to get used to the Mission's handling,
which is unlike any other glider I've flown to date. A turn can
be performed with light brake pressure even while weight-shifting
away from the turn. The brake pressure increases from 1/4 brake
onwards. Lean into the turn as well, and the Mission swings around,
without the bite of the Spear/Spark. There is more of a delayed
response than the Spear, though compared to most other gliders,
the Mission handling is direct. The Mission likes to tilt you away
from the turn, and has a tendency to flatten out after 90 degrees.
To keep thermalling efficient, continued weight shift is needed.
The light brake pressure and flat turn can catch you out if you're
used to heavier handling, so watch that inner wingtip to avoid spinning.
The Mission does not turn as tight as the Spear, but it does seem
more efficient, with higher roll stability.
In thermic conditions,
the Mission provides a lot of feedback, and must be flown actively,
otherwise it will yaw from side to side. There is no sense that
it wants to tuck - the wing has a deep aerofoil section, and higher
volume than it's predecessors, creating a 'spring-tensioned' leading
edge feeling. It is just very lively.
GLIDE : Word on
the street is that the Mission has as good a glide as the Octane,
which puts it just short of the Bagheera and Quarx. So it's right
up there with the latest in the DHV2 class.
SPEED : The trim
speed is high, so you'll be able to push against a headwind with
ease. The wing also converts dive and roll energy into a long, fast
glide. This is not the direct climb out associated with the Spear,
but a more efficient, delayed 'fade-off' of the speed, so you maintain
the trim speed for longer. You won't have to deal with the irritating
pitch oscillation of the Spear, but you will have to allow the Mission
more room to maneuvre when close to the ridge, due to the delayed
conversion.
Stomping on the speedbar
does not seem to affect the wing much - the stability was high,
the glide was fine, the speed increased moderately (7km/h). The
Mission I flew did 46km/h flat out at low altitude, which is slightly
less than the Astral2 and the Octane, but the wing is maybe more
stable at this speed.
SECURITY : According
to the DHV tests, the Mission is about as good as a DHV2 glider
gets before it becomes a DHV1/2. Asymmetrics are its wildest move,
and this is because the rate of turn is "high with deceleration".
I found asymmetrics very hard to induce, because the wing resisted
my tug on the A-riser by warping and returning to its shape without
deflation. A sharp, hard yank on the A's did collapse the wing,
which turned rapidly and entered a spiral (no pilot input), inflating
after 180degrees. So when it finally does collapse, it is fairly
hot for a DHV2, but it won't collapse often, and reinflates on its
own.
Big ears reinflate on
their own. When tucked the maneouvre provides a good 3m/s descent,
with good roll-stability in weight-shift turns.
The stall speed is low,
if you keep it in a straight line, but turning it while on deep
brakes is not recommended.
All the others maneouvres
score 1/2's or 1's, making it quicker to recover than even the Swing
Astral2. But its agility makes it more of a handful to control in
rough air, and I would class it alongside the Octane as an 'upper
2' glider, requiring competent, intelligent piloting.
SUMMARY : If you're
getting tired of wrapping your brake handles around your feet to
get your glider to turn, the Mission will be the answer to your
prayers - light handling, easy turns, and good thermalling. The
Mission does retain a lot of the feeling of the Spear, being highly
agile and active, with lots of feedback, so it is not suited to
the novice xc pilot or the conservative weekender who would prefer
reassurance over performance. For the pilots who feel at home in
the sky, it's a very efficient wing with a unique feel, and you're
unlikely to have a tuck if you fly actively. The colour scheme is
attractive, the finish of the FreeX product leaves a smile on your
face, and the glider bag is the best in the business. To see if
you enjoy the enigmatic FreeX flavour, contact your dealer for a
test-flight.
A BIG THANKS TO : Geoff
Legward for lending me his personal glider. Anthony Allen for the
funky FreeX cap.
Thanks to http://www.hi-xposure.co.za/
|